Effective Face-to-face Tutorials of Online English Learning Lie In Interaction of Higher Levels of Cognitive Domain and Affective Domain of Bloom’s Taxonomy  

Ding Jiali Foreign Languages Department of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, PR.China

Keywords: online English learning; face-to-face tutorials; Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives; higher levels of Cognitive Domain; Affective Domain

Introduction

Online English learning as an outcome of the rapid development of Internet has got a wider and wider market in China. However, problems of varieties have also occurred along its way. People never stop thinking of better strategies either in designing online course wares or tutorials to help smooth the learning process. My experience as a tutor is that interaction of higher levels of cognitive domain and affective domain of Bloom’s Taxonomy plays an important role in face-to-face tutorials of online English learning.

 In 1956 Benjamin Bloom headed a group of psychologists at the University of Chicago who developed a classification of levels of intellectual behavior important in learning. The research group identified three domains of educational activities. The three domains are cognitive, affective, and psychomotor which are interrelated and overlapping. “Cognitive is for mental skills, affective is for growth in feelings or emotional areas, while psychomotor is for manual or physical skills” (Donald Clark 1999). Bloom wanted to change the then American educational system, in which people were focusing on cramming knowledge at the expense of neglecting to cultivate the students’ creativity. Therefore, Bloom's Levels of Critical Thinking and matching verbs were created. These "thinking" categories were among the first efforts to define the word "learning" and began to develop the first educational goals for “creative thinking and problem solving.”

(http://www.sacs.k12.in.us/buddy/dridgeb/schweigert/BBiog.htm) His taxonomy was the outcome of his research on the educational psychological experiments and has become a very popular guideline in educational practice ever since its appearance. Bloom and his research group divided cognitive domain into six hierarchical levels-knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation, among which knowledge and comprehension are low levels, and knowledge is the lowest. The then American educational system was focusing on knowledge the lowest level too much, which Bloom and his research group believed as the reason why students were restricted their imagination and creativity. The six hierarchical levels of cognitive domain division has been practiced in teaching approaches and training ever since. Thus the students get a creative training while acquiring knowledge. Affective Domain includes the manner in which we deal with things emotionally, such as feelings, values, appreciation, enthusiasms, motivations, and attitudes.

People once pointed out that ‘Bloom’s cognitive domain is adaptable to online teaching, however little can be accomplished by teaching affective domain in online learning”. (Gerald Newton,1999). It is because many online learning courses do not have face-to-face tutorials. It is also because of the truth that people have tended to emphasize cognitive development. (Tom Allen 1993). However, “If the teaching purpose is to change attitudes/behavior, then the instruction should be structured to progress through the levels of the Affective Domain” (Tom Allen 1993). With the interpretation of the views accounted above, integration of Cognitive Domain and Affective Domain is a faceable and effective way to change attitudes and transmit information and knowledge at the same time, as was explained above, the three Domains are interrelated and overlapping. (In this very article, however, Psychomotor Domain is not included mainly because the features of online English learning cover mostly cognitive and affective ones). English Learning, as all languages learning, particularly needs communicative teaching settings due to the communicative and interactive nature. However online English learning like other distant courses with the sometimes-isolating nature being well documented and can affect learners in a negative way. So online English learning and teaching has huge challenge for both the teachers and students, if not guided properly, students may retreat and the dropout rate can be high, statistics revealed that the drop out rate ranged from 35 to 50 in the past three years but with 50% perticularly in online English learning process. (statistics dropout rate of Jiangnan University in 2002). One fact is that online English course designers are aware of the specific problems related to online English learning, therefore they design course wares following the six levels of Cognitive Domain and the Affective Domain of Bloom’s Taxonomy to a large degree. (see the online English learning materials and Success Orientation designed by Guyeguo and tutorials designed by Caowen) This theoretical approach to learning encourages learners to function at higher levels of cognition by encouraging independent and interdependent learning with affirmative self-confidence and esprit de corps. Face-to-face tutorials are an intricate part of such a structure- “ The typical educational model for online learning already relies heavily on the online tutor and group collaboration.” (Clive Shepherd 2000)  Face-to-face tutorials in the online English learning process should play a more important role as the sole face-to-face setting in the learning and teaching process. The tutors act as a bridge between the learners and the online administrators and teachers by helping the learners to develop affirmative attitudes toward the independent learning style and encourage the learners to collaborate with peers so that they will complete their curricula constructively. As the students have access to the first class online course wares designed by the experts, the online English learning face-to-face tutorials, instead of focusing on cognitive domain with its lowest level, they should focus mainly on the higher levels of cognitive domain and Affective Domain so that knowledge as a source of cognition, will eventually function in a leveled sense. Through the training, the learners’ confidence is sparked, the learners are able to adapt to the new study style not only in the superficial sense, but also in the inner essential sense. With gaining self-discovery, autonomy, independence and interdependence of teamwork online and in tutorials, the online English learning can be an ideal one as the desire of completing the goals is activated. While importance being placed on Affective Domain at the same time, in turn, it functions on the higher levels of Cognitive Domain in the students’ online English learning process. Hence the interaction of cognitive and affective training will ensure the students to complete the courses and realize their goals in a holistic sense.

Online English Learning Features

In the process of online English learning, there are a few unique factors as follows:

High requirements of independence; autonomy; self-access

Pitfalls: Psychologically loneliness from isolation; most of time of impersonal learning atmosphere

 Advantages: flexibility in arranging for study time; first class course wares available and other forms with efficiency and best audio video effects of high-tech online; freedom from influence of epidemic diseases (SARS for example)

Like other distant courses, online English learning requires a high degree of independence and autonomy of the learners in their learning process. It focuses on self-access. Students should be able to arrange for their time carefully and ensure sufficient time for the tasks and activities the courses require, in other words, they have to squeeze their time to study from the limited free time of their busy daily work schedule. The learners who are ready to face the challenge of time shortage and overcome it can only achieve the goal of a degree they dream. Compared with other courses like science, language learning requires even more face-to-face contact due to the communicative and interactive nature of the subject. Whereas online English majors have little chance to be with their teachers and peers, their learning process is relatively isolated and even sort of lonely, yes, it is isolated study and can be lonely. When you sit in front of an impersonal pc and learn a language all by yourself, even if with multi media, it is impersonal nature. So the second challenge an online English learner faces is loneliness, and only the one who can endure loneliness can achieve his dream. However, online English learning has its own advantages. The learner has more flexibility in arranging for his or her study sessions. Online learning allows him or her to study at irregular time within certain sporadic periods of study sessions to finish the task before the deadline. They have more options when to study as most possible. A unique advantage is that the online course wares are always available presented perfectly in audio and video form, with as much classroom-setting features as possible. On the other hand, isolation is not always a weak point as far as study is concerned. Loneliness is also necessary if you want to study something. You need definitely a period of time in which you keep yourself from distractions while you study. Besides, study with physically alone nature like online English learning is a good shelter from epidemic diseases like sars. During the outbreak of sars in some places in China, my online students got almost no influence with their study. We even joked in our tutorial some time later, that online English learning has the unique advantage which campus study can never have-they never actually stopped their study.

Given the nature of the factors coming with online English leaning, face-to-face tutorials should function as to transfer the features into the most positive and beneficial ones for the students. Therefore the first step to start is to get to know the students well.

 

Students source and their perplexities

Who are they and why do they choose online English learning? What are their perplexities?

Online English learning students are mostly adults with working experiences in different fields. Some are clerks in joint ventures, some are primary school teachers, while others may be business people or managers of various companies (online students enrolment records in Jiangnan University Centre1999-2003). They choose online English learning because they find their English not enough in their career, but their jobs and other features of an adult do not allow them to go to university as full time students. They have to get their further education as a part time student. Nowadays popularity of the pc makes the unique form of distant learning an ideal one. Nevertheless, as was introduced above, about over 50 years ago, Americans started to practice the six hierarchical levels of Cognitive Domain in their teaching and learning process in a more affirmative way, however the lowest level practice in teaching is still rooted in Chinese education ideology where the exchange of information has become the paramount function of teaching and learning, while creativity and other higher level cognitive functions seem to be all but ignored. Students find themselves in a habit of passive learning. As a result, the students of online learning do not realize their independent role in study though they assume they do. They feel blank minded without being taught by the teachers in person, more often than not, the students fail to follow the process of the learning schedule even if with the perfect guidelines of course wares. Thus many students give up soon without even trying to struggle into the half way and the dropout rate was continuously high, which is a noticeable phenomenon (again the analysis is based on the dropout rate of Jiangnan University Centerin the past three years).

 

Three Characteristic Stages of the Students’ Learning Attitudes:

I noticed even if they get the Success Orientation with the textbooks and are supposed to study as the rules and guidance in the book, some students still feel puzzled as what to do with those books, they still reckon that a teacher should “Teach” them English rather than they mainly learn from the pc screen from the remote classes by themselves. This puzzlement comes out because their habitual learning style of being dependent more on teachers still dominates their study motivation. Passive study habit is still rooted in their mind. Average students of online English learning have varieties of problems in their study. A common problem is that they thought they are independent learners but they do not fully prepare psychologically for the solitude study. As I pointed out the three features of online above, I concluded that a face-to-face tutor’s role is much more than a teacher who teaches students anything but rather a guide to assist  the students to the peak from an unknown path at the foot of the mountain. The students just see the peak in the mist up there, but they have no idea how to reach to the top most efficiently. The guide’s task is to help find a path, which leads to the peak with as less thorns-difficulties as possible. The students’ attitudes towards online study can be divided into three stages to compare with a mountain climbing: Full of Expectation Stage, in other words, it is at the foot of mountain feeling. Before they start the study process, they have not yet actually experienced the toughness of the process but seem to see the splendid peak over head, what they do not see are the difficulties along the way to reach that goal. The students are full of expectations and dreams of big goals. The second stage is the Frustrated Stage, which usually happens at the end of the first semester, at this stage the dropout rate is the highest. Those who are inflexible with different study styles and cannot adapt to the online study formula can give up in frustration and be dropped out. It is also the toughest part psychologically. The third stage is the settlement and achievement stage, it is usually after the first year, the students who endure the solitude and overcome the negative attitude now form an affirmative attitude to complete the study process, though they will still have problems in their study, their determination is firm. They won’t give up.

Tutor’s Role and Journey Starting From the Foot of the Mountain:

In order to raise curricular completion rate and reduce the dropout rate in online English learning, the Headquarters of Beiwai Online English Learning not only designed the course wares perfectly suitable to the distant learners with as considering much of the six hierarchical levels of Cognitive Domain and Affective Domain of  “human touch” features as possible but also set up the face-to-face tutorials as an intricate part of the structure. Therefore a tutor him or herself should in the first place to have a full awareness of his or her new role. The role of a teacher alters when he or she has different students and different forms of teaching. In a traditional classroom, you organize the class in accordance with the scheduled tasks and supervise the students with their study in an immediate manner. Both the students and you are used to each other. Study processes go in a face-to-face session more regularly. “In a synchronous teaching method, the teacher plays a key role. Obviously, without his or her lecturing or chatting from the other side, the teaching and learning process wouldn't take place properly (Kruse)”.  While in remote study like online English learning, asynchronous and independent and self-paced study format are its features. Jobs holders as they are, the students have different backgrounds of life and different attitudes towards study. The personal differences among the online students are much bigger than the full time students on campus. It is certainly not acceptable of a tutor to appear in the tutorial emotionlessly and read the textbook to the students during the 4-hour tutorial. With the analysis of the three stages above, the tutor’s task at the very beginning is to help the students to land on the reality and help them realize the nature of the online English learning-it is neither a goal you can not reach nor an easy thing to complete. Both the students and the tutors need full psychological preparation before the study process starts.    “Effective student and faculty preparation for the Web-based teaching and learning environment can make a significant impact on student success in their studies, thus increasing retention and curriculum completion”. (Maggie McVay Lynch 2001). A questionnaire is advisable in the first tutorial.

Why do you choose to learn English courses on-line?

Do you think a good grasp of English will help you develop yourself better than now in your work?

How tough do you anticipate it can be for you to accomplish the online English learning process?

Have you read Success Orientation thoroughly?

Do you think that your tutor should help you with your English learning in every specific detail or do you realize that your study is mainly your own thing? Why?

Are you ready to work hard independently and autonomously and even sometimes lonely in order to reach your goal?

How are you going to arrange for your limited time to keep up with the study process?

What do you expect from your tutorials and your tutor?

What benefits to your study do you think you can get from communicating with your online peers?

 How are you going to follow esprit de corps in your online learning?

The students are expected to answer the questions honestly and completely, if they cannot answer some of the questions on the list (especially the last two), which is possible, they can find the answers later on along the study process. But the questions are necessary to be raised to them as to help them be aware of their own task, and position. They are also obligated to go back to the questionnaire from time to time after they start their study and to check how they are really experiencing with their answers to the questionnaire. In addition to the questionnaire, the introduction activity of the first tutorial also functions as a bridge of the new learners to their later teamwork in a friendly atmosphere with new principles presented by the tutor. The principles include English only in tutorials, participation in the activities of the tutorials, feedback on the materials, problems outlet in the later tutorials and the collective efforts to solve the problems.

Make the tutorial a kingdom of the mingled entity of academic output and Input and outlet of negative attitudes and source of new confidence:

The first characteristic stage of the students soon disappears when they get involved in the real online English leaning. Frustration comes immediately as anticipated, but should not be as desperate as crashed from the air with tutorials on the first stage helping students have some softer landing on the realistic ground to a certain degree. The difference is with the softer landing, the students are better psychologically prepared and more realistic. It is always understandable that the students have their problems in their study process and emotion. The designing of the tutorial is to be revolved around the psychological sense to create affirmative attitudes in addition to solving comprehensive problems by encouraging them to use all the levels of application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation. In its academic sense, the importance should not be laid on cramming knowledge by reading the textbooks to the students, which is nothing creative but rather falling into the old trap. In the tutorial, the students are expected to participate fully in the individual presentation of what they have learnt and pair work, and group discussion and team project in the sense of hierarchical levels of cognition. Tutorials in its academic sense should function as both output and input class, where the students output what they have learnt from online courses and input what other students share with them or the tutor’s further analysis to an important article or whatever related to the course itself. Affectively, in order to make up for the weakness without human touch of online English learning, tutorials are to be designed into more ideal meetings where the students share their inner feelings along the study process. The students are to be encouraged to swap their learning taste in a friendly atmosphere and there and then they feel relaxed to outlet any negative feelings. When students start to complain about their inefficient work, ask if there is anyone who confronts the same problems. There must be some echoes. It is supposed to get al l the negative feelings and setbacks from the isolated study broken out in the intentional designed pipe and get cleared off in the tutorial. The tutor must be sympathetic rather than authoritative, but appropriate echo from the tutor sounds consoling, thus they feel less lonely. The tutor is to fight with the students against the overwhelming feelings such as solitude, wince and frustration, which may drive away the students. The tutor is expected to spark the student’s confidence and help transfer from the first stage to the second stage. By encouraging the students to face the challenge and activate their intrapersonal intelligence at the largest degree. As the tutors help the students to build up the positive attitude to online learning, the unique advantages of this study style is expected to put forward to the students. Behavioural scientists found that students’ potential is developed the best with affirmative implicit. The prospect of the advantages of online English learning illustrated to the students will help them to develop strategies of self-discovery in the learning process, which is the key step for the students to form autonomy and independence in their study process. Specifically Online English Learning assures the students to access the audio video materials with standard voice, they just need move the mouse and dot the curser, the first class learning materials appear on the screen with perfect voice and image. The learners are totally in the artificial environment of target language. It is standard and levelled English from the beginning. Usually the gap of target language learning between the learning stage and the application stage is big due to the non-target language environment. But the students’ working experience shortens the distance between the learning stage and the using stage of the target language, as most students of online English learning choose the courses because they are in the environment of using the language in the realistic world, and the purpose and intention of learning English is oriented. This is another advantage in their study process. Learning which is applicable immediately in the practice is the most beneficial and thus can be the source of dynamic as the intrapersonal motivation to complete the courses and realize their goals. . The tutorial is to be designed with all the possibilities of difficulties of the students may occur in anticipation, therefore, the tutor steers the direction for the learners. The students are encouraged to present tips to overcome the problems-all is expected to use the target language. Through the opening and democratic tutorials, the students find that they themselves can even solve their problems to a large extent-either their learning problem itself or their affective perplexities. Thus in guiding the students’ affective domain during the second stage, the tutor should emphasize the positive aspects so that the positive and affirmative affective domain dominates the students’ study process. .

The following are the training tables adapted from Bloom’s original taxonomy of Cognitive Domain and Affective Domain.

Table 1 Cognitive Domain Training Model Adapted In Face-to-face Online English Learning Tutorials

Knowledge: Recall of data-feedback of the materials learnt

Training Activities: Students presentation in tutorials

Examples: Recites a story from the textbook. Quotes facts in the learning material from memory to a peer. Knows the theme.

Key Words: define, recall, recognize, remember, who, what, where, when.

Comprehension: Understand the meaning, translation, interpolation, and interpretation of instructions and problems. State a problem in one's own words.

 

Training Activities: Pair Work and presentation.

Examples: Retells and rewrites the principles of learning materials. Explain in ones own words the steps for performing a complex task-from understanding a term or an idiom to a whole discourse.

Key words: comprehends, converts, defends, distinguishes, estimates, explains, extends, generalizes, gives examples, infers, interprets, paraphrases, predicts, rewrites, summarizes, translates- put in your own words, explain the main idea.  

Application: Applies what was learned in the classroom into novel situations in the workplace.

Training Activities: Group work

Examples: Uses the target language with peers online or in tutorials and workplace with native-speaker colleagues. Apply laws of statistics to evaluate the reliability of a learning project.

Key Words: applies, changes, computes, constructs, demonstrates, discovers, manipulates, modifies, operates, predicts, prepares, produces, relates, shows, solves, uses

Analysis: Separates concepts into component parts so that its organizational structure may be understood. Distinguishes between facts and inferences. 

Training Activities: Reading Skills used in news and other reading materials

Examples: identify the motives, reasons, and/or causes for a specific occurrence (Q: Why did President Bush start a war against Iraq?),

Consider and analyze available information to reach a conclusion, inference, or generalization based on this information (Q: After studying the French, American, and Russian revolutions, what can you conclude about the causes of a revolution?)

Keywords: identify motives/causes, draw conclusions, determine evidence, support, analyze, why. identifies, illustrates, infers, outlines, relates, selects, separates.

Synthesis: Builds a structure or pattern from diverse elements. Put parts together to form a whole, with emphasis on creating a new meaning or structure.

Training Activities: Project work, self-study, personal goal-setting, group work

Examples: Writes a report of online English Learning strategies,. Designs a strategy for a specific task: gaining speaking or listening comprehension or reading comprehension or writing ability in the target language. Integrates training from several sources to solve a problem. Revises and process to improve the outcome.

produce original communications(Write a letter to the editor on a social issue of concern to you.);

make predictions(What is the next probable development in online English learning equipments?); solve problems(How can we stop abusing natural resources? )

 

Keywords: categorizes, combines, compiles, composes, creates, devises, designs, explains, generates, modifies, organizes, plans, rearranges, reconstructs, relates, reorganizes, revises, rewrites, summarizes, tells, writes.

Evaluation: Make judgments about the value of ideas or materials as native speakers..

Training activities: Reflective learning activities, guided visualizations.

Examples: Forms opinions on learning materials. Selects the most effective solution in gaining the target language. Explains and justifies a new approach.

Keywords: appraises, compares, concludes, contrasts, criticizes, critiques, defends, describes, discriminates, evaluates, explains, interprets, justifies, relates, summarizes, supports

 

 

 

Table 2 Affective Domain Training Model Adapted In Face-to-face Online English Tutorials

Receiving phenomena: Awareness, willingness to hear, selected attention.

Training Activities: Introduction with new disciplines and principles in a friendly atmosphere with respect

Examples: Listen to others with respect. Listen for and remember the name of newly introduced people.

Keywords: asks, chooses, describes, follows, gives, holds, identifies, locates, names, points to, selects, sits, erects, replies, uses.

Responding to phenomena: Active participation on the part of the learners. Attends and reacts to a particular phenomenon.  Learning outcomes may emphasize compliance in responding, willingness to respond, or satisfaction in responding (motivation). 

Training Activities: Team work Group discussion

Examples:  Participates in class discussions.  Gives a presentation. Questions new ideas, concepts, models, etc. in order to fully understand them. Know the safety rules and practices them.

Keywords: answers, assists, aids, complies, conforms, discusses, greets, helps, labels, performs, practices, presents, reads, recites, reports, selects, tells, writes

Valuing: The worth or value a person attaches to a particular object, phenomenon, or behavior. This ranges from simple acceptance to the more complex state of commitment. Valuing is based on the internalization of a set of specified values, while clues to these values are expressed in the learners overt behavior and are often identifiable. 

Training Activities: Cooperative teamwork in tutorials. Peer learning.

 

Examples:  Demonstrates belief in the democratic process. Is sensitive towards individual and cultural differences (value diversity). Shows the ability to solve problems. Proposes a plan to social improvement and follows through with commitment. Informs management on matters that one feels strongly about.

Keywords: completes, demonstrates, differentiates, explains, follows, forms, initiates, invites, joins, justifies, proposes, reads, reports, selects, shares, studies, works.

Organization: Organizes values into priorities by contrasting different values, resolving conflicts between them, and creating an unique value system.  The emphasis is on comparing, relating, and synthesizing values. 

Training Activities: Teamwork in tutorials and online esprit de corps

Examples:  Recognizes the need for balance between freedom and responsible behavior. Accepts responsibility for ones

behavior. Explains the role of systematic planning in solving problems. Accepts professional ethical standards. Creates a life plan in harmony with abilities, interests, and beliefs. Prioritizes time effectively to meet the needs of the organization, family, and self.

Keywords: adheres, alters, arranges, combines, compares, completes, defends, explains, formulates, generalizes, identifies, integrates, modifies, orders, organizes, prepares, relates, synthesizes.

Internalizing values (characterization): Has a value system that controls their behavior. The behavior is pervasive, consistent, predictable, and most importantly, characteristic of the learner. Instructional objectives are concerned with the student's general patterns of adjustment (personal, social, emotional).

Training Activities: Independence, Autonomy, Self-access, Self reliance;

Cooperation; Esprit de corps

Examples:  Shows self-reliance when working independently. Cooperates in group activities (displays teamwork). Uses an objective approach in problem solving.  Displays a professional commitment to ethical  practice on a daily basis. Revises judgments and changes behavior in light of new evidence. Values people for what they are, not how they look.

Keywords: acts, discriminates, displays, influences, listens, modifies, performs, practices, proposes, qualifies, questions, revises, serves, solves, verifies.

The tables are adapted from Donald Clark’s 1999 and the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy by Tom Allen.

The two tables adapted from Bloom’s Taxonomy above show the training of hierarchical levels of Cognitive Domain and Affective Domain in a interrelated and overlapping way in online English learning tutorial training. It is not supposed to train each domain in a separate way mechanically either. The two domains should be integrated. In concrete situations, questions and activities can be flexible and vary, in other words, it should not be followed as a doctrine but rather as a guideline thoughts.  One point should be made clear in case misunderstanding occur. “Within each Domain, the categories can be thought of as degrees of difficulties. That is, the first one must be mastered before the next one can take place.” (see Donald Clark again in 1999)  For instance, knowledge of Cognitive Domain, as I mentioned before, is the lowest level and should not be attached too much importance in tutorials, which does not mean that we should neglect the lowest level. Knowledge is always very important and it is the foundation of cognition, but it is certainly not a holistic training approach to be placed all the importance on it. Let’s look back the days when people of my age used to learn and even nowadays people in some places are still learning a material in school with the non-creative formula: Materials----crammed to students----repeated to the teachers----again materials----crammed to students----repeated to the teachers. Now we realize that it was not a scientific creative training approach in learning process. Through the enclosed training of sticking to the lowest level, students are never able to apply what they have learnt from class to the reality, which explains the failure why a large number of students score highly but find themselves dumb when they have to use their knowledge in the realistic world.

Understanding should lie in the fact that learners must first access to the foundation-knowledge, without the first step, we have no chance to develop the second step, so the first step is always to input knowledge (as was pointed out above, the first class course wares are always handy online designed by experts) and through more scientific training, learners grasp the knowledge (comprehend), and with higher levels of training, they can apply, analyse, synthesize and evaluate in the realistic life with what they have learnt. While the features of online English learning students who are jobs holders from varieties of fields ensure the training approach an immediate effect they experience in their study and workplace. Affective Domain should not be trained separately from Cognitive Domain, which is because we want our learners to develop affirmative and habitual healthy attitudes in their study process and a healthy peer relationship.

The result from the interactive training can be illustrated as follows:

Online Learning Materials-------with affirmative healthy attitudes, creatively input to the students (through active learning: autonomy, independence, self-access, )----------creatively output and input the materials in tutorials and share with their peers online(interdependent learning and esprit de corps involved), put what learnt  in use in reality to test it ------achievements.

With considering the students as autonomous and cooperative learners to train, the dropout rate was reduced to 5-10% in Jiangnan University in 2003. Students’ feedback shows they have formed affirmative attitudes toward online English learning in the essential sense and will complete their courses by all means. More positively, the students have been enjoying sharing what they learn with their peers, they comment that sharing their learning experience with their peers online or in tutorials are most beneficial then enclosed learning. This newly acquired teamwork or interdependent attitude even influences their career positively. They also have been enjoying applying what they have learnt to the reality and achieving sense occurs. Online English learning has become a thought-provoking study style. In turn, the students develop an infinite motivation from their intrapersonal advancements awareness and esprit de corps. The study process goes in an ideal cycle. Once again, the interaction of training on Cognitive Domain (mainly focusing on higher levels) and Affective Domain of Bloom’s Taxonomy has proved that holistic development of the learners ideally achieved in both cognitive and affective sense.

 

Reference:

Clark D., (1999 ) Learning Domains or Bloom's Taxonomy http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html

Allen T., Retrieved on (July 30, 2003) THE TAXONOMY OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

Gerald Newton January 28, 1999  Introduction to Developing Online Electrical Course Ware”

Clive Shepherd 2000-Adding the Human Touch to Online Learning, 2000 Fastrak Consulting Ltd

(http://www.sacs.k12.in.us/buddy/dridgeb/schweigert/BBiog.htm

 Siat, J., Retrieved on (July 30, 2003) Converting to an Online Learning Environment: Overcoming Human Obstacles by Analyzing the Core Components and Constructivism Model Using the SWOT Method
 Educational Writer and Instructional Systems Designer
http://www.writinggigs.com/  
jenniesb@alum.calberkeley.org
 

Kluge, D. (1996) “I’m on the internet! Now what do I do?” The Language Teacher, 20 (11), 48-55

Newfields, T. (1997)Classroom perspectives on the internet. The language Teacher, 21(5), 42-49 

Jones, K. (1982) Simulations in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Kluge, D. (1997)The internet: Promises, problems, and possibilities. The language Teacher,  21(6), 31-35

By Clark, C. M.,  & Peterson, P. L. (1986)Teachers’ thought processes. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). Mew York: Macmillan. Willis J. 1994 Preaching what we practice-training what we teach: Task-based language learning as an alternative to P.P.P. Teacher Trainer, 8, 17-20.

McGuire, S. (1997)  Resources for teachers on the net. The language Teacher, 21()3, 33-35 Newfields, T. (1996) The first steps to internet connectivity. The Language Teacher, 20(10), 40-44

Crookall, D., Oxford, R., Saunders, D., & Lavine, R. (1990)

Our multicultural global village: Foreign languages, simulations and network gaming. In D. Crookall & R. Oxford (Eds.), Smulations, Gaming, and Language Learning (pp. 92-105). New York: newbury House.

William G. Huitt, Ph.D. (1999) Success in the Information Age: A Paradigm Shift  [see additional trends re: Toffler and Toffler]

Huitt, W. (1999a). Implementing effective school achievement reform: Four principles. Paper presented at
the School Counseling Summit, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, GA, April 20. [PowerPoint
Presentation

Huitt, W. (1999b). Why study educational psychology? Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University

Kaeck, D. (1997). Today's America. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University

Perelman, L. (1991). School's out: Hyperlearning, the new technology, and the end of education. New York: William Morrow.

Lynch M., (2002) Effective Student Preparation for Online Learning

Lynch M., (2001)Facilitating Knowledge Construction and Communication on the Internet (December 1998)